The Fitbit Surge has been long famous as the tracker from the brand. Those who are not just about counting steps should want this fitness superwatch. Other Fitbits’ activity tracking features plus GPS and a heart rate sensor are offered on this watch. However, your sports tracking needs are not only catered by this tracker. Cycling, running, and swimming are some sports that can get dedicated tracking modes along with GPS and a heart rate sensor on the second-gen sporty smartwatch, the Garmin Vivoactive HR. Comparing Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR fitness-focused watches should be made as they share most features. Keep reading to help you find one that suit your need and the budget you have.
Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR: Fitness Tracking
You can track daily heart rate data and resting HR, sleep, steps, calories, and active time with the Surge. It has built in GPS and an altimeter to track height. The Vivoactive HR offers much the same though recording your cycling and running routes will have stronger satellite coverage with the GLONASS addition. Distances and step counts from Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR has no disparity as they offer consistent data. Both also results consistent sleep data as they offer the accelerometer based tracking and baseline data. Fitbit does offer a new sleep schedule mode, but it’s hardly revolutionary. Compared to Garmin’s Connect app there is a more streamlined experience on Fitbit’s app when reviewing daily activity data and tracking.
Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR: Design
It is hard to find a stylish looking fitness watch. Most fitness watches focus on sporty ruggedness. Both the Vivoactive HR and Surge do not look attractive though there are more colors offered on the Surge. Both tie comfortably on the wrist whole day though The Vivoactive HR feels a bit lighter and slimmer around the wrist. The textured rubber straps ensure to keep tight with a watch-style grip. There are different sized straps on both though there are more eye-catching color options than the regular strap with the Vivoactive HR. touchscreen displays are offered on both though there is a slimmer color display on the Vivoactive HR while Fitbit has a 1.25 inch monochrome LCD. The color screen is muted. Those who prefer running during night would love the backlight on the Surge.
Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR: Battery Life
The Vivoactive HR is the winner in this category of Fitbit Surge Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR. With whole day heart rate monitoring switched on and is used in smartwatch mode, it can last up to eight days with GPS mode up to 13 hours while the Surge lasts five days and up to 10 hours with GPS mode.