Polar M600 Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR: Polar is one of famous sports watches producers. One of the popular models is its M400 GPS Running Watch. It has another different fitness watch, the M600. This is the first it uses the Android Wear as a running watch that can work with its own Flow platform that keeps all of your activity and progress tracked. There are apps and smartwatch functionality you can get in addition to built-in GPS and various sensors.
When compared in Polar M600 Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR, Garmin has a heart-rate monitor, GPS, and the ability to track various workouts. It costs higher than most other sport watch though. This all-round high-end fitness tracker can be personalized with third-party apps and widgets and deliver notifications from your smartphone. Here is how they are compared each other.
Polar M600 Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR: Comparison Breakdown
The Vivoactive HR is rectangular and rather thick just like the Microsoft Band. You can navigate through a couple of menus and start and pause activities using two buttons available. But not every menu on the Vivoactive HR can be accessed using these buttons. The band and clasp is conventional watch style. The Polar M600 is a stylish Android Wear watch that looks like a sports watch. The screen is square that looks a bit plain. Along the border of the display are the flakes of silver that add visual interest. The silicone band is thick and chubby that adds the dullness and looks rather grubby as it traps lint and fuzz easily. It has two control buttons to access the menu and the Polar Flow tracking service.
There are a wide range of activities tracked by the Vivoactive HR. It tracks stairs, steps, and sleep as well as biking, golfing, skiing, paddleboarding and swimming. the watch can detect an elevated heart rate when you’re moving with intensity minutes feature through its heart-rate monitors. You can take it swimming as it is water-resistant to 165 feet.
The Polar M600 is IPX8 rating waterproof up to 10 meters which is capable fr swimming and showering. At the back is an optical heart rate monitor that measure using six LEDs. Both Polar M600 Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR watches perform well in this category.
Battery And Signal
It lasts about two days for the battery life of the Vivoactive HR. It takes about 20 seconds to pick GPS signal during a rainy, cloudy day. The GPS and heart-rate monitor is really fast and accurate. The GPS mode on Polar M600 will drain the battery over five hours. The GPS and the heart monitoring are accurate and quick to pick up signal. The bottom line of Polar M600 Vs Garmin Vivoactive HR, both perform equally well.